Understanding your team’s strengths and areas for improvement is essential for any business. Two tools that help with this are the competency matrix and the skill matrix. Though they sound similar, they serve different purposes and provide unique insights into employee development. A competency matrix looks at a broader range of qualities, including behaviors and knowledge, while a skill matrix focuses on specific technical or job-related skills. Knowing the difference between competency vs skill matrix can help you make better decisions when it comes to training, performance reviews, and team management.
In this guide, we’ll explore what each matrix is, how they differ, and when to use them to improve your team’s performance.
Competency vs Skill Matrix: Key Differences
| Competency Matrix | Skills Matrix | |
| Definition | Evaluates a combination of skills, knowledge, behaviors, and attitudes | Focuses specifically on technical or role-related skills |
| Scope | Broader, covering both soft and hard skills | Narrower, emphasizing specific, measurable skills |
| Key Components | Knowledge, behaviors, attitudes, and skills | Technical abilities, job-specific skills |
| Evaluation Criteria | Based on how well an employee performs holistically, including behavioral aspects | Measures proficiency in specific, technical tasks |
| Use Cases | Leadership development, performance reviews, long-term employee growth | Skill gap analysis, project team assignments, technical proficiency |
| Application | Used for assessing both hard and soft skills, especially in leadership or complex roles | Used to evaluate technical skills required for specific roles |
| Proficiency Levels | Can include personal traits like communication, problem-solving, and adaptability | Focuses on hard skill proficiency levels (e.g., beginner, intermediate, expert) |
Competency Matrix vs Skill Matrix: Key Similarities
While the competency matrix and skill matrix focus on different aspects of employee performance, they do share some important similarities:
1. Both assess employee capabilities
The primary function of both matrices is to assess what employees can do. A competency matrix evaluates employees across a range of skills, knowledge, behaviors, and attitudes, offering a more comprehensive view. On the other hand, a skill matrix focuses on specific technical abilities or job-related skills. However, both provide a clear understanding of employee capabilities and identify areas where development is needed. Whether you are assessing technical proficiency or broader competencies like leadership, both matrices help managers understand their teams’ strengths and weaknesses.
2. Support performance management
Both the competency and skill matrices are integral tools for performance management. In a competency matrix, employees are evaluated not only on their technical skills but also on their soft skills, such as communication, teamwork, and problem-solving. This offers a more rounded assessment of overall job performance. In contrast, a skill matrix zeroes in on technical abilities, offering a more focused evaluation of job-related skills. Despite this difference, both tools help in measuring how effectively employees are performing their roles and highlight areas where they excel or need improvement.
3. Aid in identifying gaps
Identifying gaps in employee skills or competencies is critical for building a strong workforce. Both matrices assist managers in spotting these gaps, though the scope differs slightly. A skill matrix helps reveal missing technical skills within a team, such as proficiency in specific software or machinery. A competency matrix, however, can highlight broader gaps, including areas like leadership, decision-making, or adaptability. Both matrices allow managers to pinpoint these gaps early, making it easier to address them through training or hiring.
4. Help with workforce planning
Effective workforce planning ensures that employees are placed in the right roles based on their strengths. Both the competency matrix and skill matrix are structured tools that assist managers in this process. A competency matrix allows organizations to align employees with roles based on their overall competencies, which is particularly important when planning for leadership or long-term development. A skill matrix, on the other hand, ensures that employees with the necessary technical abilities are assigned to tasks or projects where those skills are most needed. In both cases, these tools make workforce planning more strategic and efficient.
5. Facilitate training and development
Both matrices are essential for planning targeted training and development. A skill matrix helps organizations create specific training programs that address technical skill gaps. For example, if a team lacks proficiency in a particular programming language, the skill matrix makes this gap clear, allowing managers to plan the appropriate training. A competency matrix facilitates more holistic development by identifying areas like communication, problem-solving, or leadership that need enhancement. Both matrices enable managers to craft personalized development plans that target specific needs, whether those needs are technical or behavioral.
6. Follows a similar sturcture
Both matrices are structured tools, providing a clear, organized way to assess employee capabilities. In both cases, the structure typically includes proficiency levels—such as beginner, intermediate, and expert. This structure allows managers to easily evaluate where each employee stands, making it straightforward to understand who needs development and in what areas. Whether assessing technical skills in a skill matrix or more comprehensive competencies in a competency matrix, this structured approach ensures a clear and consistent way to measure performance and progress.
These shared features make both matrices essential tools for managing and developing a high-performing team.
What is a Competency Matrix
A competency matrix is a tool used by organizations to evaluate the skills, knowledge, and behaviors that employees need to perform their jobs effectively. Unlike a skills matrix, which focuses solely on specific technical abilities, a competency matrix takes a more comprehensive approach by looking at the overall qualities that contribute to success in a role.
This matrix is typically structured as a table that lists the different competencies required for a job across various roles or levels within the organization. It helps managers assess employees, identify areas for development, and create targeted training programs.
For example, if you’re creating a competency matrix for a sales team, you might include competencies like communication, negotiation, product knowledge, and customer relationship management. Each of these competencies would have different levels of proficiency, allowing managers to see where an employee stands and what they need to work on.
A competency matrix is especially useful for:
- Performance evaluations: By assessing employees on a range of competencies, you get a clearer picture of their overall contribution to the team.
- Leadership development: Competencies often include soft skills like emotional intelligence, making the matrix helpful for identifying future leaders.
- Training and development: Once you know which competencies need improvement, you can design personalized training programs to help employees grow.
What are competencies?
Competencies refer to the combination of skills, knowledge, behaviors, and attitudes that an employee needs to perform well in their role. They go beyond just technical abilities and include both hard and soft skills. Competencies are what make an employee effective in their job, not only in terms of completing tasks but also in how they approach challenges, collaborate with others, and contribute to the organization’s culture.
Here’s a breakdown of what makes up a competency:
- Skills: These are the specific abilities that employees need to perform their tasks, such as technical know-how, project management, or customer service. For example, a software developer needs coding skills, while a marketing manager needs analytical skills.
- Knowledge: This refers to the information and expertise an employee needs to have for their role. It could be industry-specific knowledge, product knowledge, or understanding of company processes and procedures.
- Behaviors: Competencies also include how employees act in various situations. For example, how well they communicate, manage conflict, lead others, or adapt to change. These behaviors are often critical for leadership roles and teamwork.
- Attitudes: An employee’s mindset, values, and commitment to the organization are also part of their competencies. For example, being proactive, demonstrating integrity, or having a growth mindset are attitudes that contribute to success.
Each competency usually has different levels of proficiency, such as beginner, intermediate, and advanced. These levels help managers and employees understand where they stand and what they need to improve to reach the next level.
What is a Skill Matrix
A skill matrix is a tool that organizations use to evaluate and track the specific abilities that employees possess. It’s essentially a table that lists the critical skills needed for various roles and shows how proficient each employee is in those skills. This matrix helps managers quickly identify skill gaps within teams and understand who is best suited for particular tasks or projects.
For example, in a software development team, a skill matrix template might list programming languages, database management, and testing frameworks as the key skills. Each employee would be rated on their proficiency in those areas, often using a scale like beginner, intermediate, or expert.
A skill matrix is especially useful for:
- Project assignments: It helps managers quickly match employees with the tasks or roles they are most skilled at.
- Skill gap analysis: By identifying which skills are lacking within a team, managers can plan for training or hiring to fill those gaps.
- Training and development: Once gaps are identified, targeted training programs can be designed to improve specific skills.
- Cross-training: A skill matrix can help managers ensure that more than one person on a team has proficiency in critical areas, reducing the risk of bottlenecks when certain employees are unavailable.
What are skills?
Skills are the specific, measurable abilities that an employee needs to complete tasks or fulfill their role in an organization. Unlike broader competencies, which include behaviors and attitudes, skills focus on the practical, hands-on aspects of a job. They are often divided into two categories: hard skills and soft skills.
Here’s a breakdown of each:
- Hard skills: These are the technical abilities or specialized knowledge that employees need to perform their job. Hard skills are usually learned through education, training, or experience, and they can be measured objectively. For example, coding, data analysis, and operating machinery are all hard skills. In most cases, employees need hard skills to handle the core responsibilities of their role.
- Soft skills: These are interpersonal or non-technical abilities that help employees interact effectively with others. Soft skills include communication, teamwork, time management, and problem-solving. While soft skills are harder to measure, they are just as important as hard skills in many roles, particularly those involving teamwork or leadership.
Skills are often broken down into different levels of proficiency, such as:
- Beginner: Someone who is just starting to learn the skill and needs guidance.
- Intermediate: Someone who has enough experience to perform tasks independently but might need help with more complex problems.
- Expert: Someone who has mastered the skill and can teach others or handle the most challenging tasks.
Unlike competencies, which encompass a broader range of behaviors and attitudes, skills are task-oriented. They are the tools employees use to complete specific assignments or contribute to a project. In a skill matrix, each skill is carefully mapped out, and employees are rated based on their level of proficiency, making it easy to identify strengths and areas for improvement.
What’s the Difference Between a Competency Matrix and a Skills Matrix?
A competency matrix and a skills matrix are both tools used to evaluate and manage team capabilities, but they focus on different aspects of an employee’s performance. Here’s a detailed look at how they differ:
1. Scope and Focus
The main difference between the two lies in what they measure.
- Competency matrix: This tool takes a broader approach. It assesses not just skills, but also knowledge, behaviors, and attitudes that employees need to perform well in their roles. For example, a competency matrix for a manager might include leadership, communication, problem-solving, and emotional intelligence. It’s not just about what someone can do, but how they do it—covering both the technical and personal traits that make them effective.
- Skills matrix: A skills matrix, on the other hand, zeroes in on specific job-related abilities. It lists technical or functional skills that employees need to do their tasks. For example, a software development team’s skill matrix might include programming languages, database management, and testing tools. It’s all about what someone can do and how proficient they are in those particular areas.
2. Use Cases
- Competency matrix: Organizations typically use competency matrices for long-term development. It’s valuable for assessing leadership potential, creating development plans, and conducting performance reviews. This is because competencies are broader and include both soft and hard skills, focusing on how an employee behaves in various situations.
- Skills matrix: A skills matrix is often used for more immediate, practical purposes, like assigning the right people to projects, identifying skill gaps, or building training programs. It’s a straightforward tool to evaluate whether a team has the necessary skills to complete specific tasks.
3. Evaluation Criteria
- Competency matrix: Employees are assessed on a wider range of criteria that go beyond technical skills. For example, you might evaluate someone on their ability to communicate, lead others, or manage conflict, alongside their job-specific skills. Competency matrices often focus on both individual and organizational values, making them useful for building well-rounded teams.
- Skills matrix: The evaluation here is purely based on whether employees have the required technical abilities. It typically includes a rating system, such as beginner, intermediate, and expert, to measure the level of proficiency. This makes it useful for quickly identifying who is capable of performing specific tasks.
4. Flexibility and Application
- Competency matrix: This tool is more flexible because it can be customized to fit different roles within the company. You can create a competency matrix for leadership roles, customer service roles, or technical roles, each focusing on a blend of skills, knowledge, and behaviors that match the job.
- Skills matrix: Skills matrices are more rigid and role-specific. They focus purely on the technical side of things, so they are ideal for teams like IT, engineering, or project management, where particular skills are critical to success.
5. When to Use Each Matrix
- Competency matrix: Use this when you’re looking to develop employees in a well-rounded way or assess them for roles that require both soft skills and technical expertise, such as management or leadership positions.
- Skills matrix: Use this when you need to quickly assess your team’s technical capabilities or when you’re working on short-term projects where specific skills are the priority.
Helpful Resources
Learn everything you need to know about competency models with this comprehensive guide. Discover how they help define the skills and behaviors needed for success in any role
Streamline your talent management process with the competency framework template. Define key skills and behaviors, improve employee performance, and align your workforce with organizational goals efficiently.
Learn how to conduct a skill gap analysis to identify workforce skill deficiencies, align employee capabilities with business goals, and plan effective development strategies.
When to Use the Competency Matrix vs Skill Matrix
Knowing when to use a competency matrix versus a skill matrix depends on what you’re trying to achieve within your organization. Both tools are powerful, but they serve different purposes. Here’s a detailed look at when each should be used.
1. Use the competency matrix for long-term employee development
A competency matrix is best suited when your goal is to develop well-rounded employees and leaders. Since it focuses on a broader range of qualities—such as behaviors, attitudes, and knowledge in addition to skills—it’s particularly useful for:
- Leadership development: Competencies like decision-making, emotional intelligence, and team management are critical for leadership roles. A competency matrix helps assess whether employees have the soft skills needed to grow into these roles.
- Performance reviews: Competency matrices offer a more holistic view of how employees perform in their roles, especially when you want to evaluate both their technical abilities and how they interact with others or handle challenges.
- Organizational culture alignment: Since competencies often include behaviors and attitudes that reflect a company’s values, using a competency matrix ensures that employees not only have the right skills but also fit the organization’s culture. This is important when developing teams that contribute positively to the workplace environment.
- Long-term development: Competency matrices allow you to create personalized growth plans for employees, helping them develop not just in their current role but also for future positions. It’s ideal for preparing individuals for more complex, leadership-focused roles.
2. Use the skill matrix for short-term project needs and technical proficiency
A skill matrix is more effective when you need to focus on specific, technical abilities. This tool provides a straightforward way to assess whether your team has the hard skills required to complete tasks and meet project goals. It’s ideal for:
- Project assignments: If you’re managing a project that requires certain technical expertise, a skill matrix helps you quickly see who is proficient in the necessary skills, like coding, data analysis, or machinery operation. This ensures that the right people are assigned to the right tasks.
- Skill gap analysis: A skill matrix allows you to easily spot where your team is lacking critical skills. This is helpful when you’re planning for future projects or trying to identify which areas need training or new hires.
- Cross-training and redundancy: By using a skill matrix, you can see which employees possess overlapping skills, which is useful for cross-training. It helps ensure that multiple people are capable of performing key tasks, reducing risks if certain team members are unavailable.
- Immediate technical needs: When your primary concern is whether employees have the required hard skills for a role, the skill matrix is the tool to use. It helps you quickly assess technical proficiency without diving into broader aspects like behaviors or attitudes.
3. Use both together for a complete picture
Integrating a competency matrix and a skill matrix offers various opportunities to enhance talent management. Here are some scenarios where combining both matrices can lead to more effective results:
Building high-performing teams
Imagine you’re assembling a team for a new product launch. The project requires both technical expertise and leadership capabilities. In this scenario, using a skill matrix alone might lead you to select team members based solely on their technical skills, such as marketing, product development, or data analysis. However, if you incorporate a competency matrix, you can evaluate team members’ communication, leadership, and problem-solving abilities alongside their technical proficiencies.
This allows you to build a balanced team, where each member not only excels in their specific skill set but also brings crucial soft skills, such as collaboration and adaptability, ensuring the team works well together and delivers a successful project.
Identifying leadership potential
Consider a scenario where you’re looking to fill a managerial role. Relying solely on the skill matrix might limit you to employees who are technically proficient but may not have the leadership qualities required for the role. By combining the competency matrix, which evaluates behaviors like decision-making, empathy, and strategic thinking, you can identify employees who not only have the necessary technical expertise but also possess the competencies required for leadership.
This holistic view helps you choose candidates who can manage teams effectively, rather than promoting individuals solely based on their technical skills, reducing the risk of selecting someone who might struggle with leadership responsibilities.
Addressing training needs
In this scenario, let’s say you notice that certain employees are struggling to adapt to new technologies. A skill matrix will highlight gaps in their technical knowledge, showing that they need training on new tools or software. However, if the competency matrix is added, you may uncover additional challenges, such as a lack of adaptability or problem-solving skills, which are crucial for learning new technologies.
By using both matrices together, you can create more effective development plans. Not only will the employees receive technical training, but they will also benefit from coaching or workshops aimed at improving adaptability and resilience, ensuring they can thrive in a rapidly changing environment.
Project assignments
Imagine you’re assigning team members to a high-priority project. A skill matrix will help you match the technical requirements of the project, ensuring each member has the necessary abilities. However, some projects, particularly cross-functional ones, require more than just technical skills—they demand teamwork, creativity, and conflict resolution.
By also consulting the competency matrix, you can ensure the selected team members bring the right balance of soft skills to complement their technical expertise. This results in a team that not only gets the job done efficiently but also works harmoniously, overcoming challenges through strong collaboration.
Performance reviews and promotions
In a performance review scenario, focusing only on the skill matrix could lead to rewarding employees for their technical contributions alone. However, adding the competency matrix into the review allows for a more comprehensive evaluation. An employee who excels in problem-solving, leadership, or teamwork but is only moderately skilled in certain technical areas might still be a strong candidate for promotion, based on their potential for growth and their overall contribution to the company culture.
Maximizing Workforce Potential: Competency vs Skill Matrix
Understanding the differences between a competency matrix and a skills matrix is crucial for effective workforce management. While a competency matrix offers a broader view by assessing both technical skills and behaviors, a skills matrix focuses solely on the specific abilities needed to complete tasks. Each tool has its place: use a competency matrix when focusing on long-term employee development and leadership potential, and a skills matrix for evaluating technical proficiency and assigning tasks.
By using both tools together, you gain a complete understanding of your team’s strengths and areas for improvement. This allows you to make better decisions around training, project assignments, and career development, ultimately leading to a more capable and well-rounded workforce.
FAQs
What is the main difference between a competency matrix and a skill matrix?
- A competency matrix assesses a combination of skills, knowledge, behaviors, and attitudes that contribute to overall performance in a role. It looks at both technical abilities and soft skills, like communication and leadership.
- A skill matrix, on the other hand, focuses specifically on technical or job-related skills, measuring proficiency in specific tasks or tools required to do a job.
When should I use a competency matrix instead of a skill matrix?
How do I decide which matrix to use?
The decision depends on your objective:
- If you want to focus on job-specific skills and ensure that employees are technically qualified for a role or task, use a skill matrix.
- If you want to look at a broader picture, assessing both technical skills and soft skills, such as leadership or communication, then a competency matrix is more appropriate.
How often should competency and skill matrices be updated?
What are the benefits of using both matrices together?
Using both matrices together provides:
- A comprehensive view of an employee’s abilities.
- A better understanding of where technical training and behavioral development are needed.
- Insights for workforce planning, ensuring the right balance of skills and competencies.
- Support for long-term development and succession planning by highlighting both hard and soft skills.
