<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: What do Bing &#038; Wave tell us about Google and Microsoft&#8217;s DNA	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://creately.com/blog/experience/what-do-bing-wave-tell-us-about-google-and-microsofts-dna/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://creately.com/blog/experience/what-do-bing-wave-tell-us-about-google-and-microsofts-dna/</link>
	<description>Latest Product Updates and Tips on Working Visually</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2024 13:07:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Kymm		</title>
		<link>https://creately.com/blog/experience/what-do-bing-wave-tell-us-about-google-and-microsofts-dna/#comment-6066</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kymm]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 04:01:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://creately.com/blog/?p=261#comment-6066</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[i think that Bing is not as good as Google.                                    Google would still index new websites faster than Bing. Microsoft would still need a lot of catching to do with GoogleBot.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i think that Bing is not as good as Google.                                    Google would still index new websites faster than Bing. Microsoft would still need a lot of catching to do with GoogleBot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Alan		</title>
		<link>https://creately.com/blog/experience/what-do-bing-wave-tell-us-about-google-and-microsofts-dna/#comment-2098</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2009 16:11:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://creately.com/blog/?p=261#comment-2098</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Bing is a vast improvement over Google, keeping the best parts and leaving out the spam.  Their graphic interface is at a whole other level as well.  The search history feature is very nice.  Google has so many agendas with data, it makes one&#039;s head spin, but the search engine which first appeared in 1998 hasn&#039;t improved much.  In my opinion, the borg wins this one.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bing is a vast improvement over Google, keeping the best parts and leaving out the spam.  Their graphic interface is at a whole other level as well.  The search history feature is very nice.  Google has so many agendas with data, it makes one&#8217;s head spin, but the search engine which first appeared in 1998 hasn&#8217;t improved much.  In my opinion, the borg wins this one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: George		</title>
		<link>https://creately.com/blog/experience/what-do-bing-wave-tell-us-about-google-and-microsofts-dna/#comment-1437</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[George]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 06:15:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://creately.com/blog/?p=261#comment-1437</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[i have been evaluating the search results of Microsoft Bing compared to Google and they are comparable. Bing gives almost the same relevant search results just like Google.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i have been evaluating the search results of Microsoft Bing compared to Google and they are comparable. Bing gives almost the same relevant search results just like Google.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: melatoninlady		</title>
		<link>https://creately.com/blog/experience/what-do-bing-wave-tell-us-about-google-and-microsofts-dna/#comment-1224</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[melatoninlady]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2009 10:13:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://creately.com/blog/?p=261#comment-1224</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Microsoft Bing would be the closet competitor of Google. but i still use Google because it shows more relevant results on the serp.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Microsoft Bing would be the closet competitor of Google. but i still use Google because it shows more relevant results on the serp.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: chandika		</title>
		<link>https://creately.com/blog/experience/what-do-bing-wave-tell-us-about-google-and-microsofts-dna/#comment-171</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[chandika]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 07:03:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://creately.com/blog/?p=261#comment-171</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&#039;open&#039; was left in quotes as no company is really truly open. Google is what I like to call &#039;almost&#039; open. MS of course does not qualify. :)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8216;open&#8217; was left in quotes as no company is really truly open. Google is what I like to call &#8216;almost&#8217; open. MS of course does not qualify. 🙂</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Puja Madan		</title>
		<link>https://creately.com/blog/experience/what-do-bing-wave-tell-us-about-google-and-microsofts-dna/#comment-170</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Puja Madan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 06:21:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://creately.com/blog/?p=261#comment-170</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Brilliant post and great insights. ‘open’, reuse and contribute are going to be the guiding mantras for all tech co.s that truly want to add value. Look fwd to more such posts!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brilliant post and great insights. ‘open’, reuse and contribute are going to be the guiding mantras for all tech co.s that truly want to add value. Look fwd to more such posts!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
